The industry wants people to think this is a demand for eternal server support ... it isnt - E3 owner and Stop Killing Games clash over Californian games bill
The proposed Californian consumer protection law AB 1921 aims to ensure that gamers have access to offline versions or refunds when games are no longer supported. This has sparked a heated debate within the industry, with many arguing that it misunderstands the nature of game services. Critics claim this law could stifle innovation, forcing developers to focus on support rather than creativity. - Proponents believe it protects consumers from being left with unusable products. - The clash between the ESA and Stop Killing Games highlights the ongoing tension between consumer rights and industry practices. While the intention is noble, the implications could lead to unintended consequences for game development. Overall, this debate underscores the need for balanced regulations that consider both consumer rights and industry viability.
