Loot is too good in co-op RPG Fellowship, so its devs are trying to convince players why making it worse is better
The debate surrounding loot balance in Fellowship is intriguing and controversial. Developers argue that reducing loot effectiveness will enhance gameplay experience, but many players disagree. "Loot is meant to feel rewarding; why should we make it less so?" - Player feedback suggests that current loot levels are satisfying and engaging. - Reducing rewards might lead to frustration and decreased player retention. The proposed changes seem to undermine the core of what makes co-op RPGs enjoyable. While balancing is essential, the perceived value of loot should not be sacrificed. Developers must find a way to maintain challenge without alienating their player base. For further details, check out the full article here. In conclusion, careful consideration is needed to avoid a backlash from dedicated fans.
